Premier Solutions Consulting
The Salesforce you actually use.
Not the bill you keep paying.
Custom Salesforce development, and the hard builds beyond it, done to last. Real Apex and Lightning Web Components, real integrations, from an engineer who has spent over ten years shipping the work most teams would rather outsource than own.
Lately that means getting RIAs off Financial Services Cloud and onto Sales Cloud, with the household model built and owned instead of licensed at $1,800 a seat a year.
For RIAs and wealth firms
You are paying $1,800 per seat, per year, for a data model.
Financial Services Cloud lists at $325 per user per month. Sales Cloud Enterprise lists at $175. FSC is built on top of Sales Cloud, so that gap is not CRM capability. You already have all of that.
What the premium actually buys you is three things: a financial account object model, a rollup engine that aggregates balances and activity to the household, and a relationship tree component.
A data model, a rollup engine, and a Lightning component. That is a build, not a subscription. Person Accounts and Account-Contact Relationships are standard Sales Cloud already, so the householding foundation is sitting in your org right now, unlicensed and unused.
I have built the household views, the rollups, and the relationship model on stock Sales Cloud. It is the part firms assume they are locked into FSC for. They are not.
What the premium costs you
Based on published list pricing. Discounts move these numbers. They rarely close the gap.
The honest version
I am not going to tell you nobody needs FSC. Some firms genuinely do, and if you are one of them I will say so and we are done. What I will tell you is that almost nobody measures it. Most firms buy the industry cloud because it has their industry in the name, then populate a fraction of it and pay full freight forever.
Why timing matters
License types can only change at renewal. If your Salesforce contract comes up in the next six to nine months, this is the window where it is actually decidable. Miss it and the answer is locked in for another term.
What I build
Salesforce first.
Not Salesforce only.
Pick the problem that sounds like yours. The discipline underneath is the same every time: clean architecture, code that survives a deploy, and a system you can actually run.
Own the household model instead of licensing it.
Move off FSC onto Sales Cloud without losing householding, rollups, or relationship views, because I rebuild them as yours. Starts with a measured utilization audit, so the decision comes from your own numbers rather than my opinion.
Fix the Salesforce someone else left you.
Inherited an org held together by hope and half-finished Flows? I go in, map what is really happening, untangle the automation, and get you back to something you can build on instead of tiptoe around.
Custom Apex, LWC, and the architecture underneath it.
Heavy custom Apex and Lightning Web Components, a data model that fits how you actually work, and deploy-safe code you can hand off without a babysitter. Real engineering, not a managed package with a fresh coat of paint.
Wire Salesforce into the rest of your business.
Custodial platforms, planning tools, the data warehouse, scheduling, messaging. Built with retry logic and real observability so it does not fail silently at 2am and take you a week to notice.
Automation and workflow
Flow, Apex, and cross-platform automation that removes the manual copy-paste steps eating your week.
Custom apps and web
Standalone apps, client portals, and sites in Next.js and TypeScript, with the code delivered to you.
Ongoing retainer
Stay on the system after launch. You keep me because it is worth it, not because you are locked in.
The way I work
Built, not configured.
How a lot of consultants work
- Drop a managed package on a stock org and call it a platform.
- Bill for the setup, then go quiet when it stops scaling.
- Leave you dependent so the invoices never really stop.
- Treat your data model like it is someone else's problem.
How I work
- Write the Apex. Write the components. Own the architecture.
- Build it so your own team can understand and run it.
- Stay on when you want me, not because you are trapped.
- Build things that compound instead of configs that decay.
A lot of consulting in this space is a reseller dressed up as a builder. This is not that. I write the code, ship the system, and stay on the line for as long as you run it. It is real engineering, which is exactly why it still holds up years later.
The short version
A decade of shipping.
No shortcuts, no theater.
Salesforce, deep
Heavy custom Apex, Lightning Web Components, data modeling, deploy guardrails, and integration work. The level of depth most companies think they need a whole platform team to reach.
Yours to keep
You get the source code, the access, and the documentation. No holding your own system hostage, no vendor you have to go through to change a field.
One engineer, direct
The person who scopes your project is the person who writes the Apex. No account-manager telephone game, no offshore pod, no junior quietly learning on your dime.
Things I have actually built
Every one of these ships as a product someone sells per seat.
That is the whole argument. The expensive thing on your invoice is usually a build, and a build is a one-time cost you own.
Household views and rollups, on stock Sales Cloud.
A relationship model spanning people, entities, and accounts, with balance and activity rollups to the household and a relationship tree component. This is the exact capability firms assume they have to license an industry cloud to get.
Ask your org a question in plain language.
A natural-language assistant running against the org's own data. Who owns what, which clients moved, what changed last quarter and who changed it. Answers grounded in your records, not a per-seat bolt-on stapled to the side.
Advisor calendars that respect drive time.
A scheduler that builds real calendars against real constraints: availability, territory, and the actual travel time between appointments. Routing and booking solved together instead of a link that ignores geography.
Custodial, planning, and warehouse pipelines.
Two-way integrations into custodial and planning systems, plus BigQuery data pipelines driven from Apex. Built with retry logic and real observability, so it does not fail silently at 2am and cost you a week to notice.
Who I work with
RIAs and wealth firms paying industry-cloud prices for a data model they could own. Teams inheriting an org that has gotten away from them. Operators who would rather own their systems than rent them one invoice at a time.
How engagements work
Most projects start with a paid audit, where I map the system, the integrations, and what is actually broken. From there it is fixed-scope work or an ongoing retainer. No mystery scoping, no eighty-page statement of work you need a lawyer to read.
Start here
Not sure where the problems are?
Start with a paid audit.
A fixed-fee diagnostic with a real number at the end of it. Every other shop in this market gives away a free health check, which tells you exactly how much thought went into it. This one costs money because it takes work and it is worth having.
You keep the full write-up either way, even if we never work together again. That is the whole point. You should own your system, not rent access to understanding it.
What you walk away with
- A clear map of your org, automation, and integrations as they really are.
- The risks and technical debt that will bite you, ranked by what matters.
- A prioritized fix list you can hand to anyone, including a cheaper developer.
- A straight answer on what is worth doing and what is not.
The full read on an org you inherited or outgrew. What is there, what is fighting itself, what is quietly costing you, and what I would fix first.
Book the org auditFor RIAs on Financial Services Cloud. What you pay, what you actually populate, what leaving would cost, and the payback period. Credited against the migration if you go.
See the FSC auditStart a project
Tell me what you're trying to build.
No discovery-call theater. Send a paragraph about the system you're running, what's broken, and what you'd want it to do instead. I reply within one business day with a real read on whether it's a fit, including when it isn't.